Home  |   Jihad Watch  |   Horowitz  |   Archive  |   Columnists  |     DHFC  |  Store  |   Contact  |   Links  |   Search Tuesday, February 09, 2010
FrontPageMag Article
Write Comment View Comments Printable Article Email Article
Font:
The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America (Continued) By: David Horowitz
FrontPageMagazine.com | Friday, February 10, 2006


The implications of this symbiosis were drawn by the conference panels, which are listed in the table of contents as follows: “Student Movements” “Student Unions” “Historians for Social Justice” and “Bridging the Gap Between Academia and Activism.” In other words, the symbiosis of activism and scholarship reflected a self-conception in which radical professors would function as the mentors and protectors of student activists, deploying their intellectual skills in behalf of “progressive” political causes. History professor Jesse Lemisch a founding member of “Historians Against The War,” began his presentation with these words: “As historians, teachers and scholars, we oppose the expansion of American empire…” Speaking on the final conference panel, Professor Lemisch spelled out the connection that academic radicals like himself made between their roles as scholars and their political goals: “Being an activist is a necessary prerequisite for historians who want to see through the reigning lies, and I take it as a given that we must be activists. Writing history is about challenging received authority. Activist experience gives the historian experiential understanding of the power of the state, repression, social change, … the depth of commitment of those with power to maintaining the standing order through their journalists, historians, police and law firms…. You can’t begin to understand how history happens unless you have this basic training as a historian/activist. A good dose of tear gas makes us think more clearly as historians.”[1]

Far from being marginal, Lemisch’s endorsement of activist scholarship is shared by leaders of the academic profession. Jacquelyn Hall is a Professor of History at the University of North Carolina and, like Eric Foner, a former president of the Organization of American Historians. Like Foner and Lemisch, she is also a member of Historians Against The War and had this to say about Taking Back the Academy: “In considering the broad social and political responsibilities of intellectuals in society, this book calls for a revitalized definition of what it means to be a scholar-citizen in the Twenty-first Century. For scholars in the humanities, that call could not be more timely. Alternatively maligned as politically irrelevant or dangerously subversive, historians and other stewards of society’s subjective truths increasingly must be prepared to articulate – and defend – their function in today’s marketplace of ideas and corporatized universities.”[2] These are the words of an activist rather than a scholar. But at the Columbia University conference the distinction was no longer recognized.

The Law of Group Polarization

 

The professors profiled in this volume are drawn from public and private universities, from small institutions and large ones, and from schools that are both secular and religious. Among them are individuals prominent in their institutions and at the forefront of their professions. They are the authors of books widely used as texts in their fields. They have been funded by the prestigious foundations that support academic work and have been awarded the highest professional honors in their fields. They are department chairmen and directors of academic institutes and programs, and the heads of large professional associations. Among them are presdents and former presidents of the American Historical Association, the American Anthropological Association, the National Ethnic Studies Association, the American Philosophical Association, the Modern Language Association, the American Sociological Association and the Middle East Studies Association. As tenured faculty they have a prominent role in the hiring and promotion of future generations of university professors. In a word they are representative figures, widely influential in the academic world.

 

At the same time and notwithstanding their impressive credentials, these professors (as their profiles demonstrate) are capable of making disturbingly shallow intellectual judgments and expressing alarmingly crude political opinions. Like Ward Churchill, their excesses implicate not only themselves but an academic culture. 

 

My most difficult task in writing this book was living daily with the knowledge it provides of the enormous damage that several generations of tenured radicals have inflicted on our educational system and its students; and of being cognizant of the unrelenting malice that so many of them hold in their hearts for a country that has given them the great privileges and freedoms they enjoy as a birthright.

                                                                                                                                        December 2005

 

Notes:



[1] Ibid. p. 188. [Emphasis in original]

[2] Ibid.

[3] Sokal was himself a leftist, disturbed over what he (correctly) saw as the corruption of “progressive” thought.

[4] Profiled in this volume.

[5] http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/lingua_franca_v4/lingua_franca_v4.html
For a book on the controversy, see Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont, Fashionable Nonsense: Post-Modern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science, Picador Books, 1998.

[6] Cass Sunstein, “The Law of Group Polarization,” Social Science Research Network – University of Chicago Law School, December 1999 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=199668.

[7] Daniel Klein and Charlotta Stern, “Surveys on Political Diversity in American Higher Education”
http://www.studentsforacademicfreedom.org/reports/Surveys.html;

Daniel Klein and Charlotta Stern, “How Politically Diverse Are The Social Sciences and Humanities?”
http://www.ratio.se/pdf/wp/dk_ls_diverse.pdf.

[8] Vincent Carroll, “Republican Professors? Sure, There’s One,” Wall Street Journal, May 11, 1998;
Rob Natelson, “Academia Locks Out Conservative Professors,” The Billings Outpost, February 17, 2005;
David Horowitz and Eli Lehrer, “Political Bias in the Administrations and Faculties of 32 Elite Colleges and Universities,” FrontPageMag.com
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Content/read.asp?ID=55.

[9] Daniel Klein and Charlotta Stern, “Surveys on Political Diversity in American Higher Education,” http://www.ratio.se/pdf/wp/dk_aw_voter.pdf
They conducted a separate study of junior faculty at both schools reflecting this disparity.

[10] Paul Krugman, “An Academic Question,” New York Times, April 5, 2005.

[12] Klein and Western, op. cit.

[13] Stanley Rothman, S. Robert Lichter, Neil Nevitte, “Politics and Professional Advancement Among College Faculty,” The Forum, Vol. 3, Iss. 1, Art. 2, 2005 http://www.cmpa.com/documents/05.03.29.Forum.Survey.pdf.

[14] Rothman, Lichter, Nevitte, op. cit.

[15] On the importance of these committees see Chapter 4: The Representative Nature of the Professors Profiled in this Volume, below.

[16] Herbert Marcuse, “Repressive Tolerance,” 1965.
http://grace.evergreen.edu/~arunc/texts/frankfurt/marcuse/tolerance.pdf

[17] “Politics in the Classroom,” The Skidmore News, April 29, 2005.

[18] Martin Trow, “Californians Redefine Academic Freedom,” Academic Questions, Summer 2003
http://gspp.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/emeritus/calif_redefine_adademic_freedom.pdf;
David Horowitz, “
California’s Betrayal of Academic Freedom,” FrontPageMag.com, September 14, 2004;
(Two incidents precipitated the change in UC policy on academic freedom. The first was the complaint of a student at UC Berkeley that her Middle Eastern studies lecturer had told students that the notorious Czarist forgery, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, was true. The Protocols describes a Jewish plot to control the world and was a document used by the Nazis to justify the extermination of Jews. The student’s complaint was dismissed by university authorities. An official of the UC Academic Senate defended the professor’s preposterous and bigoted statement as coming under the protection of “academic freedom.” The second incident involved a required freshman English writing class conducted by instructor Snehal Shingavi. Shingavi is the head of the International Socialist Organization, a group that describes itself as “Leninist” and calls for violent revolution. He is also head of Students for Justice in
Palestine. Shingavi organized an anti-American demonstration on September 11, 2001 after the World Trade Center attacks and has been arrested for leading illegal and violent demonstrations on campus. Shingavi’s course was called “The Politics and Poetics of Palestinian Resistance,” and was listed in the catalogue along with the warning “Conservative thinkers are encouraged to seek other sections”).

[19] E.g., Penn State and Ohio State (and indeed, nine of eleven public colleges and universities in Ohio). http://www.studentsforacademicfreedom.org/archive/2005/April2005/OhioSummaryCurrentAFPolicies042705.htm

 

Click Here to support Frontpagemag.com.


David Horowitz is the founder of The David Horowitz Freedom Center and author of the new book, One Party Classroom.


We have implemented a new commenting system. To use it you must login/register with disqus. Registering is simple and can be done while posting this comment itself. Please contact gzenone [at] horowitzfreedomcenter.org if you have any difficulties.
blog comments powered by Disqus




Home | Blog | Horowitz | Archives | Columnists | Search | Store | Links | CSPC | Contact | Advertise with Us | Privacy Policy

Copyright©2007 FrontPageMagazine.com